THE RATIOFACE REPORT / SAMPLE EDITION

A face, explained.

A guided look at facial geometry. Start with the main findings, follow the measurement lines, and explore the numbers when you want more detail.

This is an AI-generated fictional adult, not a customer. Every reading below was produced once from this image by the same engine as the free tool, and is shown here as a fixed example.

FICTIONAL SUBJECT · FIXED SAMPLE RESULT

Guides follow detected landmarks; they are not an illustration of an ideal face.

Photo note: Photo conditions can affect measurements. Keep your head and camera level for a more comparable result.

01 / At a glance

Your main findings.

Your result

Mixed alignment

Symmetry is your strongest component in this photo. Explore Golden ratio to understand the largest contribution to the gap from the selected references.

Contour reference

Diamond

The measured outline is closest to the Diamond reference. Oval is the next closest option.

Your strongest component

Symmetry

Left and right landmark pairs are your closest match to our reference.

Explore this component

Golden ratio

Reference matches describe the model's chosen geometry. They do not establish an ideal appearance.

Experimental harmony index6.88 / 10

A weighted reference comparison. This is not a beauty grade or a population ranking.
68.8 / 100 · harmony-0.3.0

The canonical score is 68.8 / 100. Dividing it by ten gives 6.88 / 10. The band is a product setting, not a population percentile. 100 is not a goal or a perfect face.

Overall proportions

How the visible face is divided.

Guides follow detected landmarks; they are not an illustration of an ideal face.

Measured from this image

The Middle section occupies the largest share of the measured vertical window (43.8%). This tells you how the visible sections divide this photo.

17.3%Upper

43.8%Middle

38.9%Lower

Lower alignment

The measured geometry differs substantially from the selected reference.

A larger share means a longer section within this measurement window. It does not, by itself, mean a feature needs changing.

What this means

The measured geometry differs substantially from the selected reference.

Left & right

A comparison of paired landmarks.

Guides follow detected landmarks; they are not an illustration of an ideal face.

Measured from this image

Excellent alignment

The measured geometry very closely matches the selected reference.

Across ten paired landmarks, the average mirrored difference is 0.5% of cheek width.

A smaller difference means the paired points sit closer to their reflected positions. Some difference is expected in a photograph; expression and head position also contribute.

Average mirrored difference: 0.5%
Eye-width difference: 0.1%
Midline deviation: 0.1%

What this means

The paired landmarks show very close mirrored alignment in this photo.

Eyes & spacing

Where the eyes sit and how their corners align.

Guides follow detected landmarks; they are not an illustration of an ideal face.

Measured from this image

The inner-eye gap is 1.18 times the mean measured eye width.

This compares spacing with the size of the eyes in this image. It is a relative measurement, not a recommended target.

Measured corner inclinations are 6.5° on the anatomical right and 6.9° on the anatomical left.

Inner gap / mean eye width: 1.18×
Right corner inclination: 6.5°
Left corner inclination: 6.9°

Eye-corner tilt, FWHR and front-view jaw angles describe this photo. They do not add points to this score. The jaw angles are 2D contour readings, not a side-profile bone angle.

What this means

The inner-eye gap is larger than the mean measured eye width.

Contour & shape

The width relationships behind the shape estimate.

Guides follow detected landmarks; they are not an illustration of an ideal face.

Diamond / Contour reference

Lower-contour width is 77.5% of cheek width; upper-contour width is 73.3%. These relationships help explain the Diamond reference match.

The estimate uses contour height and upper/lower widths together. One ratio alone cannot determine a face shape.

Contour height / cheek width: 1.224
Lower width / cheek width: 0.775
Upper width / cheek width: 0.733

These are geometric reference matches, not fixed identities or calibrated probabilities.

A diamond-shaped face typically shows wider cheekbones, with a narrower upper and lower contour.

The alternative is the next closest reference, not proof of a borderline result. These are estimates from this photo, not fixed identities.

What this means

The lower contour is narrower than the cheek span, giving this outline a tapered lower section.

Reading your result

What this photo can — and cannot — tell you.

Make your next comparison a fair one.

If you compare another photo, keep the same camera distance, head position and neutral expression. Use even light and keep the full face visible.

Analyze my face

What to keep in mind

No configured quality warnings were triggered. This is not a guarantee of measurement accuracy.

This report does not measure skin quality, age, personality, color season or features that require a side view.

Reference matches describe the model's chosen geometry. They do not establish an ideal appearance.

Scores describe reference alignment, not grades or population rank.
100 is not a goal. Different geometry is not a flaw.
Photo conditions matter. Compare similar camera distance, pose and expression.
Descriptors are not scoring components.
This report is not medical advice.

All measurements

The complete measurements, available when you want them.

How the four components contribute

Symmetry

Excellent alignment

The measured geometry very closely matches the selected reference.

95.9 / 100

40% weight

Facial thirds

Lower alignment

The measured geometry differs substantially from the selected reference.

46.4 / 100

20% weight

Facial fifths

Strong alignment

The measured geometry closely matches the selected reference.

84.9 / 100

20% weight

Golden ratio

Lower alignment

The measured geometry differs substantially from the selected reference.

21.2 / 100

20% weight

These labels describe reference alignment, not attractiveness or population rank. Overall bands use the existing index thresholds (60, 78, 83, 87). Component bands use 60, 70, 80 and 90 out of 100; these are editorial categories, not validated human norms.

Explore all 22 measurements

Lengths are ratios, not millimeters. Angles are in degrees. Three decimal places show calculation detail, not a claim of real-world precision.

Measurement	Reading	Scoring reference	Scored?	What it measures
Upper visible third	0.173	0.333	Yes · Facial thirds	Upper contour landmark to brow midpoint / visible contour height. The landmark is not the actual hairline.
Middle visible third	0.438	0.333	Yes · Facial thirds	Brow midpoint to nose landmark / visible contour height.
Lower visible third	0.389	0.333	Yes · Facial thirds	Nose landmark to chin / visible contour height.
Outer interval 1	0.177	0.200	Yes · Facial fifths	First of five adjacent spans across the aligned face, divided by the full horizontal span.
Eye interval 2	0.208	0.200	Yes · Facial fifths	Second horizontal span / full horizontal span.
Inner-eye interval	0.246	0.200	Yes · Facial fifths	Third horizontal span / full horizontal span.
Eye interval 4	0.207	0.200	Yes · Facial fifths	Fourth horizontal span / full horizontal span.
Outer interval 5	0.162	0.200	Yes · Facial fifths	Fifth horizontal span / full horizontal span.
Cheek width / brow-to-lip height	1.419	No scoring reference	No	Cheek width / brow-to-upper-lip height.
Middle visible fraction	0.438	No scoring reference	No	The same reading as the middle third; it is not scored a second time.
Right contour angle	137.1°	No scoring reference	No	Front-view angle at the anatomical right lower-contour landmark.
Left contour angle	136.1°	No scoring reference	No	Front-view angle at the anatomical left lower-contour landmark.
Deviation from 1.618	0.394	0.000	Yes · Golden ratio	Absolute deviation of aligned vertical contour height / cheek width from 1.618.
Mirror difference / face width	0.005	0.000	Yes · Symmetry	Mean mirrored distance across ten landmark pairs / cheek width.
Eye width difference / mean eye width	0.001	No scoring reference	No	Absolute eye-width difference / mean eye width.
Midline offset / face width	0.001	No scoring reference	No	Mean nose, mouth and chin distance from the aligned midline / cheek width.
Eye gap / mean eye width	1.176	No scoring reference	No	Inner-eye gap / mean eye width.
Contour height / cheek width	1.224	No scoring reference	No	Contour top-to-chin distance / cheek width; used for shape matching. The scoring component uses aligned vertical height.
Lower contour width / cheek width	0.775	No scoring reference	No	Lower-contour width / cheek width; used for shape matching.
Upper contour width / cheek width	0.733	No scoring reference	No	Upper-contour width / cheek width; used for shape matching.
Right eye outer-corner tilt	6.5°	No scoring reference	No	Anatomical right eye-corner angle after eye-axis alignment; positive means the outer corner is higher.
Left eye outer-corner tilt	6.9°	No scoring reference	No	Anatomical left eye-corner angle after eye-axis alignment; positive means the outer corner is higher.

Algorithm: harmony-0.3.0

Read the full methodology

Your browser's print dialog can save this sample as a PDF. This is not the planned paid report delivery.